- July 29th, 2009, 4:29 pm
#31783
^Pretty sure he knows that..... This speculation is driving me crazy. Wonder when we get the next clue? Probably when track arrives.
coasterbruh wrote:Not all coasters can run more than 2 trains. What coaster at carowinds actually needs more than 2 trains other than rochoet?
coasterbruh wrote:And by the way most hyper trains seat 36...so why could cedar fair go for less seats since the obviously care about capacity unlike the nazis at paramount...
jasonwilson88 wrote:Guys I'm aware there are trims on Goliath but on my ride I couldn't feel them, unlike other rides where they are noticeable. Should have been clearer. Also, I know trims have no bearing on the decision to include an MCBR, but I DO know that rides will trim a train conditionally when there are 3 on the tracks as opposed to 2 to keep all of them in line (see certain Mad Mouse style coasters). I'm simply saying that a trimless MCBR'less ride would be better than a 3 trainer with trims and an MCBR that ruins the second half like many have noted on Diamondback.
if anything the MCBR made the ride better because it adjusted the ride for even better airtime on the return hills after the MCBR.
JamminJ wrote:coasterbruh wrote:And by the way most hyper trains seat 36...so why could cedar fair go for less seats since the obviously care about capacity unlike the nazis at paramount...
Let me just correct you in saying that Diamondback and Behemoth are both 32, the rest of the B&M hypers are 36.hey essentially took out a row for the sound system, but the rest of the Intamins are 36.
coasterdave wrote:Diamondback FOF wrote:
It is what has been revealed by inside sources and what has been leaked. There is nothing that can be read by the public that says that. It is (for all intensive purposes) a contract that has been signed. People in the industry know about that and eventually it gets from those sources to lower people like us. Just take it as being true because most things like that are (well, as long as they're not outrageous, and this isn't...)...
How did I know you where going to answer this.
I was just asking him for some hard evidence that would prove to me (and maybe others) that it was a fact and not some circumstantial evidence... And it seems to me that nothing can be proved fact just hearsay.
...to my knowledge KD has not started something like this yet?
bgwfreak wrote:jasonwilson88 wrote:Guys I'm aware there are trims on Goliath but on my ride I couldn't feel them, unlike other rides where they are noticeable. Should have been clearer. Also, I know trims have no bearing on the decision to include an MCBR, but I DO know that rides will trim a train conditionally when there are 3 on the tracks as opposed to 2 to keep all of them in line (see certain Mad Mouse style coasters). I'm simply saying that a trimless MCBR'less ride would be better than a 3 trainer with trims and an MCBR that ruins the second half like many have noted on Diamondback.
I don't know who said the MCBR was like that on Diamondback, I got 8 or so rides on it in May and if anything the MCBR made the ride better because it adjusted the ride for even better airtime on the return hills after the MCBR.
I've been on 3 B&M hypers, they all have trims, 2 of the 3 have MCBR's, and I can never recall it slowing down a train so much that you crawl back to the station and don't get any air.