MarkD wrote:For those of you who know, how much does it cost to run a Webcam that refreshes every minute and a half or so versus one that streams live video?
Is it in the hardware?
I ask because several parks do not have a webcam, ours is slower than paint drying and Earthcam is pretty awesome. All are free, at least to us they are.
I am no expert but I have installed and integrated surveillance systems at my former job. That was 10 years ago and some technology has changed since then. But back then, most of they systems I worked with allowed you to choose how you wanted to configure it. Since I was doing it for residential customers who wanted to check out their home from remote locations, they wanted live streaming.
However, I would assume that a commercial entity such as Carowinds would use other options in the base unit as it appears they have which would prevent live streaming. Quality bandwidth is not free and I can only imagine the cost of tens of thousands of views a month doing live streaming.
Looking at the source code for their page, it appears the base unit is generating a JPG image which is then loaded into the page with a refresh set for 1 minute:
cam1.BaseURL = "http://174.121.245.214/cfcc/WindSeeker_640.jpg";
cam1.theTimer = setTimeout('reloadImage(cam1)', 1);
A configuration like that would keep the bandwidth down to a reasonable level. So I don't think it has to do with limitations in the hardware but a purposefully configuration setting to allow us some insight into the park without them wasting a bunch of money on bandwidth. That is my 2 cents on the topic.